The Community Roundtable

Empowering global community leaders with research-backed resources, training, and tools.

  • Who we are
    • Our Values
    • Our Team
    • Our Clients
      • Client Success Stories
      • Member Advisory Board
    • Community Leadership Awards
      • Community Leadership Awards 2022
      • Community Leadership Awards 2021
      • TheCR Awards 2020
      • TheCR Awards 2019
      • TheCR Awards 2018
      • TheCR Awards 2017
    • Careers
      • 2022-23 Community Management Fellow
  • What we do
    • Benchmarking and Audits
      • Community Performance Benchmark
      • Community Readiness Audits
      • Community ROI Calculator
      • The Community Score
    • Models and Frameworks
      • Community Maturity Model™
      • Community Engagement Framework™
      • Community Skills Framework™
      • The Social Executive
    • Research
      • The State of Community Management
        • SOCM 2022
        • SOCM 2021
        • SOCM 2020
      • Community Careers and Compensation
      • The Community Manager Handbook
        • 2022 Edition
        • 2015 Edition
      • The Social Executive
      • Special Reports
    • Training and Events
      • Upcoming Events
      • Data-Driven Community Management Workshop
      • Connect
        • Connect 2023
        • Connect 2022
      • Community Technology Summit
      • Training
      • Resource Bundles
    • Resources
      • Vendor Resource Center
      • Community FAQs
      • Community Management Podcasts
        • Community Conversations
        • Lessons From The NEW Community Manager Handbook
      • Community Management Jobs
        • Job Board
        • CMGR Profiles
      • Community 101
        • Community Management Glossary
        • Community Management FAQs
      • Case Studies
      • Community Webinars
  • Who we serve
    • Resources for Community Managers
    • Community Program Owners
    • Community Executives
  • TheCR Network
    • Member Login
    • Join TheCR Network
    • Roundtable Call Library
  • TheCR Library
    • Subscriber Login
    • Subscribe to TheCR Library

The Value of Community Management: Reviewing the SOCM 2013

February 16, 2016 By Ted McEnroe

By Ted McEnroe, Director of Research and Training, The Community Roundtable

value of community management - socm 2013The value of The State of Community Management in 2011 and 2012 was to give definition to the competencies and qualities of communities. By 2013, we were ready to shift the focus of the research to something different but equally game changing – quantifying what community management looks like.

The State of Community Management 2013 report was our landmark first effort to apply a quantitative lens to what had been considered the “art” of community. Our first survey and subsequent report explored community data in four general areas: community management, community program, community demographics and community profiles (use case, budge, management resources, etc.).

Community leaders in 2013 saw themselves at the vanguard of organizational change – 55% described their organizations as “innovators” and 43% said their organization was “fully networked.” But even taking into account the relatively advanced maturity of this group, the findings broke down some long-held myths about community.

Respondents outlined a community management role that was more complex, and required more experience in organizational communication and less technical acumen than traditionally assumed.

value of community management - socm 2013 infographicRespondents highlighted the inherent tension in a role that bridged internal and external audiences, and the stresses that created, especially in large communities with few resources.

Respondents began to define the standard elements of community and those more common in communities that could measure their value – highlighting for the first time the power of new member programs, advocate recognition programs and regular community member input in decisions affecting the community.

The responses also highlighted the key metrics of community – and the recognition that traditional social media metrics didn’t apply well to measuring community programs’ success.

And perhaps most notably – the report provided critical quantitative evidence that the “90-9-1” rule was a flawed model. Rather than 90% lurkers, 9% contributors and 1% content creators, the report found even average communities averaged 55% lurkers, 30% contributors and 15% creators.

SOCM2016_GetStarted_BadgeThe 2013 report set the standard for our ensuing research, which has continued to get beneath the surface of what community management looks like and the power of communities to drive behavior change.

This post is part of a series on the history and findings of the State of Community Management reports. The survey period for the State of Community Management 2016 is open now, at https://the.cr/socm2016survey. Participants receive their own community maturity report for their time – and your next coffee is on us!

About Ted McEnroe

comments powered by Disqus
Community best practices

Resources for the people who build online communities.

ABOUT US
Our Values
Our Team
Our Clients
Careers

RESOURCES
Vendor Resource Center
Podcasts 
Job Board
Community 101
Case Studies
Webinars
Upcoming Events

PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
Benchmarking and Audits
Models and Frameworks
Research
Training and Events

RESOURCES BY AUDIENCE
Community Managers
Community Program Owners
Community Executives

QUICK LINKS
Blog
Newsletter
About TheCR Network
About TheCR Library
About TheCR Academy

LOGIN
TheCR Network
TheCR Library
TheCR Academy

Contact
Support
Partnership
Inquiries
Subscribe to
Our Newsletter